A. I. Cuza University of Iaşi


Software Engineering

Course nameSoftware Engineering CodeCS2209
Class Computer Science, 2007 - 2010
Level Undergraduate Year 2 Semester 2 Status Compulsory
Hours per weekTotal hours per semesterTotal hours of individual workCreditsEvaluation typeTeaching language
CSLPr
2 0 2 0 56 94 5 M ro
Taught byAcademic and scientific title, name
Teaching Assistant, PhD Student, Adrian Iftene
Required courses
ObjectivesBulding a proffesional attitude towards software development. Students learn techniques enabling them to develop quality software artefacts while observing the customer's demands for functionality, costs and deadline.
General thematicsSoftware process models. Requirements engineering. Modeling and modeling languages. UML. Design patterns. Functional testing. Structural testing. Software metrics. Project management. Ethics.
Seminary / Laboratory thematicsRequirements engineering. UML. Design patterns. Software testing. Software metrics.
Teaching methodsCourse slide presentations. Lecture notes and tutorials available electronically.
Bibliography
  • Ian Sommerville: Software Engineering, Addison Wesley, 2001
  • Craig Larman: Applying UML and Patterns, Addisson Wesley, 2002
  • Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, John Vissides: Design Patterns, Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addisson Wesley, 1998
EvaluationconditionsLab activity

Exam

criteriasMinimum lab score 150p

Minimum exam score 150p

modesLab: written assignements, problems, whole-semester projects

Written exam

formulaFinal score is the sum of lab score and exam score

For the students who satisfy the evaluation criteria, the final grade is obtained by applying the Gauss courve on the final scores:

grade 10 – first 10%

grade 9 – next 25%

grade 8 - next 30%

grade 7 – next 25%

grade 6 – last 10%

The students whose exam results are between 100p and 149p, yet have a sufficient general activity during the semester, receive grade 5.

The students who take part in the exam receive a grade, otherwise they are considered absent. If any of the evaluation criteria are not met, the student receives a grade lesser than or equal to 4.


© 2006-2008 FII | about | intranet